You were never crashing because of lunch
Three o'clock arrives and somebody unplugs you. You know the feeling, the screen stops making sense, and you read the same line four times. You would put your head on the desk if anyone would let you. And you have decided it was you had for lunch.
So, you try the smaller lunch., cut the bread out. Or maybe you have had soup instead of a sandwich, and the salad instead of the jacket potato, cheese and baked beans (god I remember those!). Perhaps it helped for a day or two, but most 3pm feel exactly the same. Which leaves two conclusions available to you. Either you are doing it wrong, or this is simply what you are like now. I would like to offer you a third.
The explanation everyone gives has barely been tested
Last October, a team at Hoshi University in Tokyo set out to find the research linking food and blood sugar to feeling sleepy and unproductive at work. A fair question, given how confidently we all talk about it. They searched two major databases and found 521 papers. After applying their criteria, nine studies were left. Nine. Two of which measured blood glucose continuously. One took a single blood sample. That is the whole evidence base underneath a claim most of us treat as gospel.
Now, a thin evidence base is not the same as a wrong answer. I want to be clear about that, because the temptation here is to overclaim in the opposite direction. What it means is that something we all have accepted and repeated many times has been examined far less than many of us know. But my friends, what I love about all my research into these things is that when you look at what those nine studies actually found, and it gets more intriguing.
Two findings that should change how you think about this
The first
A study put participants through a thirteen-day protocol where every meal was moved five hours later. The effect on their glucose was dramatic. The daily rhythm of their blood sugar shifted by nearly six hours and their average glucose came down.
The effect on how they felt was reported as no change in sleepiness, no change in hunger. Their blood sugar pattern moved most of the way around the clock, and the people it belonged to noticed absolutely nothing.
The second
Another study ran the other way, giving sedentary adults three-minute walking breaks every hour. Their fatigue improved significantly and their glucose did not change at all.
So in one study the glucose moved and the feeling stayed put. In the other the feeling moved and the glucose stayed put. Which suggests they are not the same story.
So, what is actually happening at three o'clock?
Your body clock has a trough in it. Not the big one that makes you sleep at night, a smaller dip that sits in the early afternoon. Researchers have tested this by replacing lunch with hourly liquid supplements, so there was no meal to blame. Some people dipped anyway, and the ones who did turned out to have a measurably different body temperature rhythm from the ones who did not. It was a small study, twelve people (so we need to hold it lightly), but it points the same way as everything else.
How strongly you feel it appears to be individual. Some people barely notice while others feel like they've been unplugged
Three things worth knowing
Your afternoon coffee is doing two jobs, and only one of them is helping. Caffeine blocks the receptors that make you feel tired, so you perk up. It also temporarily reduces your insulin sensitivity, meaning your body handles sugar less well for a while afterwards. The three o'clock coffee does fix the sleepiness, but it's also working against the thing you thought you were fixing.
The same meal does not behave the same way at different times of day. A 2024 study tracked more than eleven thousand meals in 789 people wearing continuous glucose monitors. Blood sugar responses were lowest in the morning and highest in the afternoon. Identical food, different outcome, depending on when you ate it. I see this in clinic too. Clients wearing continuous glucose monitors, and clients simply keeping a food diary, will often eat the same thing at lunch that they had at breakfast and report feeling completely different afterwards. Different energy, and frequently different digestion. NOTE - That is observation rather than evidence and I would not dress it up as anything more. But it matches what the research found, and it is the sort of thing people only notice once they start writing it down. Which means the afternoon is not just when you feel it. It is when your body is least good at dealing with what you have given it.
Night owls have a harder time. People with a strong evening preference tend to have lower daytime alertness, higher fasting glucose and a higher long term blood sugar marker. If you have always been a late person who struggles in the afternoon, those two things are related, and neither is a character flaw.
What can help
None of it is on your plate, which is the part most people find surprising.
Daylight. One of the nine studies tested different lighting after lunch and measured brain activity to check. Both blue rich light and red tinted light improved alertness compared with normal office lighting. Getting outside at lunchtime is your no cost option.
Movement, in small amounts. Several of these studies found that brief activity breaks reduced fatigue. Three minutes an hour, two minutes of standing every twenty, a sit stand desk. The sit stand study found the benefit was most pronounced after lunch, which is exactly when you need it.
The night before. A poor night's sleep makes the afternoon dip considerably worse. Your three o'clock problem is often a left over from the night before.
And the one I feel nobody talks about but I have scheduled my day around this - don't schedule your hardest work for the afternoon!. The dip is predictable; you do not have to defeat it. Put the admin there and move the thinking to the morning.
Honesty time
The nine studies in that review had small sample sizes. Very few of them measured sleepiness, blood sugar and productivity together, which is what you would need to work out what causes what. The review did not search every database available, and the authors did not formally score the quality of what they included. And they excluded anyone with a diagnosed condition, which keeps the research clean but makes it less like a real workplace.
One more, and the most common. The authors note that nobody in the literature accounted for sex hormones. Their words, not verbatim: hormonal changes across the menstrual cycle and through menopause affect both glucose metabolism and sleep quality, and these are rarely controlled for.
So an entire field studying afternoon tiredness, in a world where half the population has a monthly hormonal cycle affecting both of the things being measured, and almost nobody has accounted for it. That is not a criticism of this review, just saying.
Where does this leave you?
Most people's afternoon dip is entirely normal. We now know it's built in and it varies between people, but more importantly it's not a sign of failure.
If yours has got noticeably worse, or it has arrived alongside being cold all the time, not recovering from training, catching everything going round, or sleeping badly, then it is not really a three o'clock question. It is a different one.
That is the work I do. Not telling you what to eat, but working out which variable is actually yours rather than guessing at it. Better is available.
Comments